The definition of gravity was explained by Sir Isaac Newton in 1665. Newton’s laws are applications of gravity’s reaction.
Newton’s First Law: Also known as the Law of Inertia, stating that an object remains at rest or in uniform motion unless acted upon by an external force.
Newton’s Second Law: Often called the Law of Acceleration, mathematically expressed as F=ma (Force equals mass times acceleration).
Newton’s Third Law: Known as the Law of Action and Reaction, stating that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
This aptly defines how gravity reactions, however, the question is: what is it? What causes gravity to do what it does?
The simple quick answer is: it’s the greatest and most abundant force in the universe. A deeper answer to the question necessitates an expanded foundation to understanding the question.
Most people have heard of Albert Einstein. Of the people reading this, most have a rudimentary interest in science and are aware of his most famous equation explaining relativity: E=MC^2. This needs clarification: “explaining relativity”. The majority of people perceive his equation as an explanation to energy, however, the famous formula is his theory of relativity.
Academia insists there can be no greater speed than light. How then, with academia’s acceptance of Einstein’s famous equation; how does the community of scientific academia justify agreeing with Einstein’s statement that energy is mass times the speed of light squared?
Looking closer at Einstein’s equation; relating to light speed: what does it mean to square the speed of light? It’s the application of Einstein’s theory to relativity. The context of mass times the speed of light squared, states that: fundamental to our existence is the realization of us traveling through the universe at the speed of light.
Science and emotions often clash. Emotions direct thought. Often, misconceptions are prevalent and accepted as fact. Look at the correlation to understanding of how people perceive relativity according to our eyesight. All images we see are inverted to the retina. The reality is: everything we see is upside down from how we observe them. Our feet cling to the ground and our bodies stretch outward; away from the planet surface.
As a generality, philosophy is based on personal experience. Opinions that make sense and are shared with others hold significant relevance. These profound statements of idealism and opinion aren’t always based in fact. This page is theory based on perceived facts, and relevant.
As to Einstein’s equation, relating to light speed: what does it mean to square the speed of light? It’s the application of Einstein’s theory to relativity. The context of mass times the speed of light squared, states that; fundamental to our existence is the realization of us traveling through the universe at the speed of light.
The perception of viewing life through our eyes displaying an inverted view, is similar to seeing everything in our universe as static; not as Einstein’s theory of relativity; moving at the speed of light.
This means all laws of physics are fundamentally flawed. This presents a conundrum to academia. Academia has accepted Einstein’s theory of relativity but, doing so requires this understanding of what the equation states.
Late in his life Einstein was interviewed by a reporter who’d asked him if there was anything he would have liked to have discovered, that he wasn’t able to figure out (this isn’t a direct quote but, the general question). Einstein replied that he would have liked to have been able to discover the makeup of gravity; to explain what gravity is.
What Einstein didn’t realize, and academia has missed, is that; in his theory: Einstein has explained gravity. How? As we look at motion, with the perspective: traveling at light speed, we gain a different view. This perspective can be used as a base to discover what gravity is. By knowing what gravity is, it can be manipulated for transportation.
To the question: what is gravity, the answer has to ask another question: is gravity a product of mass or is it a particle in subatomic matter?
Many years of research of particle mass, a theory postulates the path of particle mass. From this theory came the discovery of gravitational action.
The currently accepted theory for scientific particle charge conjecture has rationalized there is an electromagnetic force of positive and negative charges in element structure. The Center for Advanced Transportation Technology and Climate Change (CATTCC.org) has presented a new postulation for gravity motion.
Gravity and magnetism have a similar characteristic: attractive strength. Since magnetism is a process relating to the action of stray electrons in ferrous materials, then, how can atoms of non-ferrous composition hold electromagnetic properties? It is the scientific claim that magnetism is an action of ferromagnetism. Because science has established magnetic action as ferromagnetism, how are magnetic properties able to exist in sub-atomic properties and yet lose their magnetic existence in large quantities of element mass that aren’t ferrous?
Inasmuch as electromagnetics is the current dictate considered as the primary source of particle charge, it is the supposition in this new theory for gravity that it is electrogravitics which is responsible for what is referred to as electric charge in subatomic matter.
This new theory for gravity postulates that gravity is angular momentum in the path of particle motion in accordance with Einstein’s theory of relativity. His explanation of relativity being energy equal to mass times the speed of light squared shows perception of relativity: is traveling at the speed of light.
What is electrogravitics? As to relevance for a discussion about electrogravitics it delves into theoretical physics fundamentals. Electrogravitics is proposed as a foundational component to the theory of particle mass composition. Electrogravitics is similar to electromagnetics but identifies gravity as the component to subatomic electric fields. This leads to speculation that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. With this perspective, electrogravitics holds more validation than electromagnetics as the source of particle charge.
What is gravity? CATTCC identifies gravity as angular momentum in the path of particle mass.